Y19 2,488 Report post Posted December 4, 2016 OMG Vanek, just get a stick on that puck and it's a goal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
puckloo39 5,686 Report post Posted December 4, 2016 the D stopped even pretending to play bottom of the 2nd, and are currently assisting the Pens in winning this game. 1 NerveDamage reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LeftWinger 5,065 Report post Posted December 4, 2016 Can't say it enough....We Like Our Team. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HolmerDRW 29 Report post Posted December 4, 2016 Struck off Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Y19 2,488 Report post Posted December 4, 2016 As many goals as Holmstrom cause to be disallowed, how could that Pens goal have possibly stood? 1 puckloo39 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BringBack19 110 Report post Posted December 4, 2016 3 minutes ago, wings_fanatic said: Again coaching. Why was our number 1 goalie not playing in this game? Just terrible coaching. The starter should always start the 1st game of a back to back. Well Coreau got a win against their minor leaguers in the preseason. In Blashills mine that means he has a real gud record against Pittsburgh... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GoalieManPat 1,007 Report post Posted December 4, 2016 (edited) 5 minutes ago, wings_fanatic said: Again coaching. Why was our number 1 goalie not playing in this game? Just terrible coaching. The starter should always start the 1st game of a back to back. I doubt they expected to be able to win this game with Mrazek in either. Much better chance to win with him against the Islanders. Also remember that Mrazeks confidence seems to have been shakey this year. Hes just now kinda building it back. The Pens are a team that can really set you back. Edited December 4, 2016 by GoalieManPat 1 Hockeymom1960 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LeftWinger 5,065 Report post Posted December 4, 2016 Can we hire Spuddy in place of Blashill? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PavelValerievichDatsyuk 1,935 Report post Posted December 4, 2016 5 minutes ago, Y19 said: OMG Vanek, just get a stick on that puck and it's a goal. Think you meant Larkin. Vanek made the awesome pass. 1 Y19 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GoalieManPat 1,007 Report post Posted December 4, 2016 2 minutes ago, LeftWinger said: Can we hire Spuddy in place of Blashill? He kicked Spuddies tires but in the end "We like our coach" 1 LeftWinger reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BringBack19 110 Report post Posted December 4, 2016 They need to hire a search firm in the post season to find the best coach available. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GoalieManPat 1,007 Report post Posted December 4, 2016 1 minute ago, BringBack19 said: They need to hire a search firm in the post season to find the best coach & GM available. Fixed 1 gowings00 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LeftWinger 5,065 Report post Posted December 4, 2016 Remember when they hired Adam Oates as an consultant? Holy Crikey, he has to be out of business by now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Y19 2,488 Report post Posted December 4, 2016 4 minutes ago, PavelValerievichDatsyuk said: Think you meant Larkin. Vanek made the awesome pass. Pretty sure you're right. I'm gonna claim my judgement was affected by the fact that this game has made my physically ill. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LeftWinger 5,065 Report post Posted December 4, 2016 I still think Larionov would make a great coach. But Spuddy would be an upgrade for sure. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gowings00 545 Report post Posted December 4, 2016 (edited) I would call for a firesale but unfortunately everyone on this team has lost value after putting on the Wings sweater. Edited December 4, 2016 by gowings00 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
puckbags 863 Report post Posted December 4, 2016 I'm so sick of that stupid effing look that Blashill has on his face half the time that reminds me of Tortorella. Like he can't figure out what just happened. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LeftWinger 5,065 Report post Posted December 4, 2016 Did they disallow a goal? The empty net goal made it 5-3 again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GoalieManPat 1,007 Report post Posted December 4, 2016 1 minute ago, puckbags said: I'm so sick of that stupid effing look that Blashill has on his face half the time that reminds me of Tortorella. Like he can't figure out what just happened. Haha your right about that. Atleast Torts gives some entertaining sound bites Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dabura 12,228 Report post Posted December 4, 2016 Futility, thy name is Red Wings. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BringBack19 110 Report post Posted December 4, 2016 2 minutes ago, puckbags said: I'm so sick of that stupid effing look that Blashill has on his face half the time that reminds me of Tortorella. Like he can't figure out what just happened. The difference in looks between Torts and blashill is Torts understands what happened. He just can't believe how f*cking stupid his player is. I would love to watch his expression after Ericssons first shift lol. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RedWingsRox 614 Report post Posted December 4, 2016 Damn ... just 4 pages for a game with Pittsburgh ... reflection of the interest in this team. This team is very depressing to follow and watch. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Y19 2,488 Report post Posted December 4, 2016 10 minutes ago, LeftWinger said: Did they disallow a goal? The empty net goal made it 5-3 again. Yes, goaltender interference. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shocky2002 36 Report post Posted December 4, 2016 (edited) 27 minutes ago, GoalieManPat said: I doubt they expected to be able to win this game with Mrazek in either. Per my friend's own calculations (he's an analytics-reliant gambler), this is true. Mrazek vs Howard in this game isn't much of a difference because the Pens are so favored to win (68%+ either way). Against the Islanders, Mrazek gives the Wings a 2% edge over Howard (44% vs 42%) Edited December 4, 2016 by shocky2002 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MabusIncarnate 5,355 Report post Posted December 4, 2016 I'm fine with Coreau playing tonight. This is a game they went into heavily favored to lose regardless, Mrazek came off two solid starts after a few abysmal appearances, why toss him in against the offensive powerhouse Pens and risk him giving up 4-5 and knocking him down a notch? The Isles game tomorrow is less tilted, for both Mrazek and his confidence, and as a game overall that can be won. Mrazek gives us the better chance to win than Coreau in a more winnable game. Just my opinion though. 3 krsmith17, puckloo39 and roboturner reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
