Should any of #91, #13, #40, #30 be retired? Poll/Discussion

[kickazz 5,459]

BTW when I was "steering" us back it wasn't directed at you or PVD. It was directed at someone who made the sarcastic comment about Montreal.

[PavelValerievichDatsyuk 1,935]

On 4/1/2017 at 11:55 PM, kickazz said:

Well steering back to the topic though.

Zetterberg's jersey is going to be retired. Called it. And so did Kliq and a few others. Everyone who called it is a good prognosticator. Pat yourselves on the back....

Following my post about Montreal's retired numbers. It seem kind of rude. 

On 4/2/2017 at 10:48 AM, kickazz said:

Away from Montreal.

responding to Lefty's question about what was off topic.

11 hours ago, kickazz said:

Lol are people seriously not reading the reason for the thead bump.

Assumedly because we weren't talking about the right thing.

1 hour ago, kickazz said:

Where exactly did I say that we should only be talking about that? PVD don't tell me your sinking to the level of putting words in my mouth. That's pretty disappointing. 

Quote me.

Maybe it's a misunderstanding on my part, but it seems like all these bolded parts are you saying that I and others aren't the right thing.

[kickazz 5,459]

I already explained the Montreal situation, read above; was in reference to the Montreal sarcasm in those 2-3 posts by people. I was engaged in the Roy point (even quoted you!) and talked about Fedorov a couple of times (quoted Rightwinger). Ya'll gotta relax. 

 

And the comment "Lol are people seriously not reading the reason for the thead bump." was a part of the following conversation. 

19 hours ago, puckbags said:

I say not a single one of them will go up. 

 

18 hours ago, kliq said:

 

Do you mean with the exception of Zetterberg? Because Holland literally said his is going up.

 

11 hours ago, kickazz said:

Lol are people seriously not reading the reason for the thead bump.

As you can see my comment was an add-on to Kliq's response to Puckbags.

Come on guys. I feel like Regina, having a convo with Bill Berzeench. 

Edited April 3, 2017 by kickazz

[kickazz 5,459]

19 minutes ago, PavelValerievichDatsyuk said:

Following my post about Montreal's retired numbers. It seem kind of rude. 

It wasn't even in response to you lol. 

[kliq 3,763]

Come on guys......no civil war needed. Who is going to rid the pool of bacteria if the lifeguards are going at it.

[PavelValerievichDatsyuk 1,935]

49 minutes ago, kickazz said:

BTW when I was "steering" us back it wasn't directed at you or PVD. It was directed at someone who made the sarcastic comment about Montreal.

Okay, that clears it up. I hadn't seen this when I quoted you. You should understand why I thought you meant me, though. You're post was right after my long one on Montreal. I did seem the most likely target. I thought it was an interesting angle to question whether the Wings' standards are really different and I put some time that post. Then I thought it was like a version of saying "so, anyway..." Then I did quote you a page back and asked what was so off-topic about what I posted, but you didn't respond.

It did seem out of character and I should have private messaged you to clear it up. Anyway, it's all good with me. And sorry then with my wrong paraphase - It was just a misunderstanding. Bear hug?

Edited April 3, 2017 by PavelValerievichDatsyuk

[LeftWinger 5,090]

Lol, you know its been a crazy season if I'm considered one of the life guards!

 

Edited April 3, 2017 by LeftWinger

[kickazz 5,459]

52 minutes ago, PavelValerievichDatsyuk said:

Okay, that clears it up. I hadn't seen this when I quoted you. You should understand why I thought you meant me, though. You're post was right after my long one on Montreal. I did seem the most likely target. I thought it was an interesting angle to question whether the Wings' standards are really different and I put some time that post. Then I thought it was like a version of saying "so, anyway..." Then I did quote you a page back and asked what was so off-topic about what I posted, but you didn't respond.

It did seem out of character and I should have private messaged you to clear it up. Anyway, it's all good with me. And sorry then with my wrong paraphase - It was just a misunderstanding. Bear hug?

Yeah I didn't respond because I didn't want to make it "a thing" but after some more posts I knew conflict resolution was imminent. 

Also yes on the bear hug, except I'm Tigger. 

 

57 minutes ago, kliq said:

Come on guys......no civil war needed. Who is going to rid the pool of bacteria if the lifeguards are going at it.

The only bacteria on this page right now is the guy in the pic below: I think he needs another dose of antibiotics, he's been acting up lately. Call in the poolside medic I say. 

 

 

 

Edited April 4, 2017 by kickazz

[BottleOfSmoke 5,965]

*comes into thread and makes mom face*

You know who you are getting the mom face. You're lucky you made up on your own. Don't make me take you out to the pool and drown... I mean spank you goddammit. 

Lots of PMS (Playoff-Missing Syndrome) going around. 

[kickazz 5,459]

25 minutes ago, BottleOfSmoke said:

*comes into thread and makes mom face*

You know who you are getting the mom face. You're lucky you made up on your own. Don't make me take you out to the pool and drown... I mean spank you goddammit. 

Lots of PMS (Playoff-Missing Syndrome) going around. 

We need you to keep us in check  

[ChristopherReevesLegs 7,022]

5 hours ago, PavelValerievichDatsyuk said:

Okay, that clears it up. I hadn't seen this when I quoted you. You should understand why I thought you meant me, though. You're post was right after my long one on Montreal. I did seem the most likely target. I thought it was an interesting angle to question whether the Wings' standards are really different and I put some time that post. Then I thought it was like a version of saying "so, anyway..." Then I did quote you a page back and asked what was so off-topic about what I posted, but you didn't respond.

It did seem out of character and I should have private messaged you to clear it up. Anyway, it's all good with me. And sorry then with my wrong paraphase - It was just a misunderstanding. Bear hug?

Bears rule, kickazz drools 

[NerveDamage 4,176]

On 2/4/2017 at 10:40 PM, puckbags said:

I say not a single one of them will go up. 

#40 will...

[paulwoodsfan 52]

Fedorov for sure. The best player in hockey for a season, and one of the top 10 for many seasons.

Datsyuk for sure. Widely regarded by his peers around the league as the most talented two-way player and the most dangerous to play against.

Zetterberg yes. Captain of a Stanley Cup champion and a warrior for 15 years and counting.

Osgood no. Never close to the best goalie in the league. Two Cups is nothing to sneeze at but he wasn't the main reason either Cup was won.

 

[LeftWinger 5,090]

2 hours ago, paulwoodsfan said:

Fedorov for sure. The best player in hockey for a season, and one of the top 10 for many seasons.

Datsyuk for sure. Widely regarded by his peers around the league as the most talented two-way player and the most dangerous to play against.

Zetterberg yes. Captain of a Stanley Cup champion and a warrior for 15 years and counting.

Osgood no. Never close to the best goalie in the league. Two Cups is nothing to sneeze at but he wasn't the main reason either Cup was won.

 

Zetterberg was never Captain of a Cup champion. 

[kliq 3,763]

3 hours ago, LeftWinger said:

Zetterberg was never Captain of a Cup champion. 

I'm guessing he was thinking "led the '08 team" due to his Conn Smythe.

[Wheelchairsuperhero 1,453]

If Zetterberg keeps going like this, where it really feels like he's giving it all to put the team on his back, I'd say he would deserve it. Datsyuk is probably my favorite player of all time, but I think he would've had to have stuck around a bit longer for a jersey retirement. As it is there's just a funny taste from his leaving prematurely, even if I personally am not that upset about it.

[kickazz 5,459]

5 hours ago, LeftWinger said:

Zetterberg was never Captain of a Cup champion. 

 

1 hour ago, kliq said:

I'm guessing he was thinking "led the '08 team" due to his Conn Smythe.

Well assistant captain technically speaking. Him and Datsyuk/Draper. They were all part of the leadership group. 

Edited April 4, 2017 by kickazz

[LeftWinger 5,090]

2 hours ago, kickazz said:

 

Well assistant captain technically speaking. Him and Datsyuk/Draper. They were all part of the leadership group. 

As was Fedorov an assistant. 

[kickazz 5,459]

28 minutes ago, LeftWinger said:

As was Fedorov an assistant. 

Got stripped of it after 97 lol 

[LeftWinger 5,090]

...so using your logic Fedorov captained a team to a Cup victory. That's awesome, yet another reason his number must go up!

[kickazz 5,459]

50 minutes ago, LeftWinger said:

...so using your logic Fedorov captained a team to a Cup victory. That's awesome, yet another reason his number must go up!

I didn't come up with any logic. I pointed out that Z was assistant. You could say that both Z and Fedorov were both part of the leadership core in the stanley cup victories. Unfortunately for Feds though he was stripped of his title. That's not a good thing. Bringing up how Feds was an "A" doesn't work in his favor. He got stripped of that title. The things to focus on would be stuff like his accomplishments and franchise records with the team. I did some of that stuff in the initial pages of this thread in the summer.

[ChristopherReevesLegs 7,022]

37 minutes ago, kickazz said:

I didn't come up with any logic. I pointed out that Z was assistant. You could say that both Z and Fedorov were both part of the leadership core in the stanley cup victories. Unfortunately for Feds though he was stripped of his title. That's not a good thing. Bringing up how Feds was an "A" doesn't work in his favor. He got stripped of that title. The things to focus on would be stuff like his accomplishments and franchise records with the team. I did some of that stuff in the initial pages of this thread in the summer.

Ur just butthurt 

[kickazz 5,459]

Just now, ChristopherReevesLegs said:

Ur just butthurt 

That's because Pooh doesn't treat Tigger well at night 

[ChristopherReevesLegs 7,022]

4 minutes ago, kickazz said:

That's because Pooh doesn't treat Tigger well at night 

Pooh thinks tigger should stop embarassing him in front of all their friends 

[DickieDunn 2,571]

Christopher Robin has no real friends because he plays with his pooh

Sent from my LGLS676 using Tapatalk