BottleOfSmoke 5,965 Report post Posted September 25, 2015 So the accusers lawyer has dropped her as a client. I'm trying to read through the details, but it seems he didn't believe the story of how the bag came into the mothers possession, and apparently he accidentally released her name. This whole case is a dumpster fire. He did release her name, though. When he held up the bag during the press conference it was visible/had not been redacted. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DrRoCkSo_46 6 Report post Posted September 25, 2015 Kane's attorney is about to have a presser now Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jimmyemeryhunter 2,747 Report post Posted September 25, 2015 This whole case is a dumpster fire. He did release her name, though. When he held up the bag during the press conference it was visible/had not been redacted. Damn.That's messed up. I do c-c-c-cocang Yes you do Dr. Rockso. 1 DrRoCkSo_46 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DrRoCkSo_46 6 Report post Posted September 25, 2015 anyone need a presser link? can i post it here? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jimmyemeryhunter 2,747 Report post Posted September 25, 2015 Ummm. I'd imagine you can. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DrRoCkSo_46 6 Report post Posted September 25, 2015 http://www.csnchicago.com/page/live Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jimmyemeryhunter 2,747 Report post Posted September 25, 2015 The d.a. is doing a press report tomorrow, that's the one that will have the most viabke information. Thanks for the link BTW. And welcome to lgw? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DrRoCkSo_46 6 Report post Posted September 25, 2015 The d.a. is doing a press report tomorrow, that's the one that will have the most viabke information. Thanks for the link BTW. And welcome to lgw? thank you. we will know by tomorrow which direction this case goes. 1 jimmyemeryhunter reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PavelValerievichDatsyuk 1,935 Report post Posted September 25, 2015 (edited) So the accusers lawyer has dropped her as a client. I'm trying to read through the details, but it seems he didn't believe the story of how the bag came into the mothers possession, and apparently he accidentally released her name. http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/lawyer-for-patrick-kane-accuser-withdraws-as-counsel/ Haven't seen anything about him accidentally leaking her name. The way I understand it is basically the DA showed him that the mother lied about how she got the evidence. Edit: AH, that was stupid of him to leak the name that way. I did think it was weird that he was waving evidence around, but more for reasons of contamination... Edited September 25, 2015 by PavelValerievichDatsyuk Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jimmyemeryhunter 2,747 Report post Posted September 25, 2015 (edited) I hope the d.a. puts a stop to this being argued in the public tomorrow, this is like an m night shyamalan movie with all these twists. Edited September 25, 2015 by jimmyemeryhunter Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PavelValerievichDatsyuk 1,935 Report post Posted September 25, 2015 As bos said, He showed the bag which still had her name on it. yeah, just read that. Also, you quoted me before i could cover up my stupid DEA mistake. (I can think of someone thinking: now their after Kane for drugs too?) 1 jimmyemeryhunter reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jimmyemeryhunter 2,747 Report post Posted September 25, 2015 http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/lawyer-for-patrick-kane-accuser-withdraws-as-counsel/ Haven't seen anything about him accidentally leaking her name. The way I understand it is basically the DA showed him that the mother lied about how she got the evidence. Edit: AH, that was stupid of him to leak the name that way. I did think it was weird that he was waving evidence around, but more for reasons of contamination... Yeah, bos filled me in above Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DatsyukianDekes 2,428 Report post Posted September 25, 2015 Cambria: suing the accuser "not outside the realm of possibility" if it proves that this is all bunk Rightfully so. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
_SP_ 129 Report post Posted September 25, 2015 Wait a minute, how could the lady have gotten the evidence bag from police custody??? Unless she stole it while they were initially bagging evidence? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DrRoCkSo_46 6 Report post Posted September 25, 2015 (edited) Eric Macramalla @EricOnSportsLaw 12m12 minutes ago Bottom line: the credibility and integrity of the complainant's claim may be so comprised that today's events may be fatal to her case. Edited September 25, 2015 by DrRoCkSo_46 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jimmyemeryhunter 2,747 Report post Posted September 25, 2015 yeah, just read that. Also, you quoted me before i could cover up my stupid DEA mistake. (I can think of someone thinking: now their after Kane for drugs too?) Ha.No harm done. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DatsyukianDekes 2,428 Report post Posted September 25, 2015 Wait a minute, how could the lady have gotten the evidence bag from police custody??? Unless she stole it while they were initially bagging evidence? The case is a disaster. I don't understand how any of this happens. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
number9 3,297 Report post Posted September 25, 2015 So Kane is innocent? Or is her case just destroyed? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DatsyukianDekes 2,428 Report post Posted September 25, 2015 So Kane is innocent? Or is her case just destroyed? DA presser is at 11AM Eastern tomorrow. I think that will tell everyone where the case is heading. I believe it is the latter of what you posted though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Son of a Wing 1,644 Report post Posted September 25, 2015 I just don't know what to think now... Is Kane a victim? If only we actually knew what happened that night... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
number9 3,297 Report post Posted September 25, 2015 It's seeming like the case will be dropped and we'll never know what actually happened. If that's the case, i will take the very unpopular amongst the masses decision and default to him being innocent. I still will never like him, and even less so now, but I can't in good judgement consider him a rapist unless it's proven betond a reasonable doubt. *sigh* His troubled career continues 4 F.Michael, roboturner, derblaueClaus and 1 other reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PavelValerievichDatsyuk 1,935 Report post Posted September 25, 2015 This whole case is a dumpster fire. He did release her name, though. When he held up the bag during the press conference it was visible/had not been redacted. In the second press conference he also says her first name out loud. I guess the confidentiality agreement ends once you quit? Interesting I wonder if someone could be liable for leaking the name. She's could very well face harassment no matter how this thing ends up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
_SP_ 129 Report post Posted September 25, 2015 The case is a disaster. I don't understand how any of this happens. Not to get all James Patterson on everyone, but if that was a REAL bag from this case that was actually processed.... it took someone very high up to get that out and I wonder if said person hasn't threatened the lawyer with physical harm to himself or his family.... And the way he's thrown them under the bus while backing down seems sketchy...I dunno, with as much money as the owner/team/NHLPA/Kane stands to lose on this case... it smells really, REALLY bad... Even if it WAS the lady or her family getting access, what does that say about other cases investigated by Buffalo PD? How many other evidence bags come up missing? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
number9 3,297 Report post Posted September 25, 2015 Not to get all James Patterson on everyone, but if that was a REAL bag from this case that was actually processed.... it took someone very high up to get that out and I wonder if said person hasn't threatened the lawyer with physical harm to himself or his family.... And the way he's thrown them under the bus while backing down seems sketchy...I dunno, with as much money as the owner/team/NHLPA/Kane stands to lose on this case... it smells really, REALLY bad... Even if it WAS the lady or her family getting access, what does that say about other cases investigated by Buffalo PD? How many other evidence bags come up missing? Word to the wise, at the end of the day lawyers are only out for themselves and their careers. And this is coming from a guy who grew up with two lawyers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
juiceman 6 Report post Posted September 25, 2015 Wait a minute, how could the lady have gotten the evidence bag from police custody??? Unless she stole it while they were initially bagging evidence? It's likely the evidence bag that held the accuser's personal belongings (cell phone, clothes, etc). The girl likely had items returned to her after they were processed & deemed not necessary in the investigation. That would probably explain why the bag had the examining nurse's name on it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites