frankgrimes 1,836 Report post Posted May 4, 2015 Well the Leafs can always take back another bad contract to even the caphit. As much as people like to question Phaneuf he is tasked to play over his capabilities in Toronto I honestly believe he would do well here. Which other realistic and not too expensive option is available ? Boychuck is re-signed and I highly doubt the Hawks will make Seabrook available anytime soon. If we get Phaneuf he'll most likely be in the same situation, but older and probably playing on his off side. Even considering that, he might be the best d-man available. Well we have Kronner as the number 1, so Phaneuf could slide in as a number 2 or even a nice complementary piece to pair with DannyD. I also think he is the best available one because 1. I think Seabrook will stay with the hawks and 2. Green is another risk because of his injury history 1 kliq reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wings7 62 Report post Posted May 4, 2015 Some people don't understand parity and what the salary cap does. They can't get over the fact this isn't pre 2005 anymore. Boston was the president trophy winners last year. Missed the playoffs. LA Kings won the Stanley Cup last year. Missed the playoffs. Wow, must really suck to be a Wings fan.... I would take a Cup this year if it meant missing the playoffs next year. Versus making the playoffs both years and losing each time in the first round. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DatsyukianDekes 2,428 Report post Posted May 4, 2015 I would take a Cup this year if it meant missing the playoffs next year. Versus making the playoffs both years and losing each time in the first round. I think anyone would take a cup and miss the playoffs. I'm just saying, the parity of the league shows you can win a cup one year, then miss the playoffs the next. Or you can finish the season as the "best regular season team" (Bruins) but the next year miss the playoffs. Detroit isn't a dominant Hockey team anymore, and neither are the other 29 teams. The only constant is Detroit still continues to make the playoffs while all 29 other teams miss them - which in it's own regard is highly impressive. 2 BottleOfSmoke and krsmith17 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AtomicPunk 296 Report post Posted May 4, 2015 Not sure how he could have stuck with Cole and Zidlicky too long as he just acquired them at the trade deadline and Cole only played 7 games before being injured. Weiss has had injury problems since he was signed as the #1 free agent available that year and hasn't been given ample opportunity by Babs to right the ship. So I'm sure other teams are lining up and will give the Wings all those up and coming hungry young stars for him. Cleary was kept around too long, but he rarely cracked the line up this year, and wasn't a horrible liability when he was in. The point is, Cole would have been a great pickup 5-7 years ago. Zidlicky is past his "trade for" date. I'm seeing Tyler Seguin get traded to Dallas, I'm seeing James Neil go to Nashville, I'm seeing Kenny miss out on Burns a few years ago, not knowing he was even on the block, for example, not saying these players are perfect fits for the Wings, but other teams are managing to get it done. Now that we have an actual farm system and young players, trade a few picks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
number9 3,297 Report post Posted May 4, 2015 (edited) The point is, Cole would have been a great pickup 5-7 years ago. Zidlicky is past his "trade for" date. I'm seeing Tyler Seguin get traded to Dallas, I'm seeing James Neil go to Nashville, I'm seeing Kenny miss out on Burns a few years ago, not knowing he was even on the block, for example, not saying these players are perfect fits for the Wings, but other teams are managing to get it done. Now that we have an actual farm system and young players, trade a few picks. Yeah? Who did you wanna give up to get those players? A lot of assets went the other way in all those trades Edited May 4, 2015 by number9 1 Ally reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CrimsonFlame 424 Report post Posted May 4, 2015 Some people don't understand parity and what the salary cap does. They can't get over the fact this isn't pre 2005 anymore. Boston was the president trophy winners last year. Missed the playoffs. LA Kings won the Stanley Cup last year. Missed the playoffs. Wow, must really suck to be a Wings fan.... Boston fired their gm and there's a very good chance they will fire their coach too. Just making the playoffs isn't good enough for them. The penguins fired their gm and coach last year for underachieving and let's not forget they have won the cup more recently than us as well as making it past the second round more recently than us. The Kings just won a cup last year so their situation isn't really comparable. They are allowed a free pass. But I bet if they miss the post season again next year there will be another gm and head coach vacancy. The point is other franchises don't accept making the playoffs as good enough. We shouldn't either. Over half the teams make the playoffs. Just making it means you're little better than average. We're 6 years removed now from a deep post season run. Think about where you were 6 years ago and how much has changed since then. It's a long time. And it's an eternity in sports. Holland had made plenty of great moves yes. But he's also made plenty of bad ones also and he deserves a good amount of the blame for our post season failures since after all it's his job to run the team and everyone ultimately answered to him. Does that mean we fire him now? No. But the seat should start to be heating up at this point. You only get so many free passes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
number9 3,297 Report post Posted May 4, 2015 Boston fired their gm and there's a very good chance they will fire their coach too. Just making the playoffs isn't good enough for them. The penguins fired their gm and coach last year for underachieving and let's not forget they have won the cup more recently than us as well as making it past the second round more recently than us. The Kings just won a cup last year so their situation isn't really comparable. They are allowed a free pass. But I bet if they miss the post season again next year there will be another gm and head coach vacancy. The point is other franchises don't accept making the playoffs as good enough. We shouldn't either. Over half the teams make the playoffs. Just making it means you're little better than average. We're 6 years removed now from a deep post season run. Think about where you were 6 years ago and how much has changed since then. It's a long time. And it's an eternity in sports. Holland had made plenty of great moves yes. But he's also made plenty of bad ones also and he deserves a good amount of the blame for our post season failures since after all it's his job to run the team and everyone ultimately answered to him. Does that mean we fire him now? No. But the seat should start to be heating up at this point. You only get so many free passes. Yup, just making it in isn't good enough for them... they'd rather miss completely 1 DatsyukianDekes reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PavelValerievichDatsyuk 1,935 Report post Posted May 4, 2015 Boston fired their gm and there's a very good chance they will fire their coach too. Just making the playoffs isn't good enough for them. The penguins fired their gm and coach last year for underachieving and let's not forget they have won the cup more recently than us as well as making it past the second round more recently than us. The Kings just won a cup last year so their situation isn't really comparable. They are allowed a free pass. But I bet if they miss the post season again next year there will be another gm and head coach vacancy. The point is other franchises don't accept making the playoffs as good enough. We shouldn't either. Over half the teams make the playoffs. Just making it means you're little better than average. We're 6 years removed now from a deep post season run. Think about where you were 6 years ago and how much has changed since then. It's a long time. And it's an eternity in sports. Holland had made plenty of great moves yes. But he's also made plenty of bad ones also and he deserves a good amount of the blame for our post season failures since after all it's his job to run the team and everyone ultimately answered to him. Does that mean we fire him now? No. But the seat should start to be heating up at this point. You only get so many free passes. Uh, The Bruins missed the playoffs. "Just making the playoffs" may have been enough for the GM to keep his job - we don't know. He traded away a young star who is now thriving with Seguin, and put the team in a cap situation where they had to trade away boychuck, and couldn't re-sign Iginla. This clear mismanagement put them in the position that they went from a top team to missing the playoffs Pens' GM got fired because they mortgaged the future on deadline acquisitions that failed and have failed supply complimentary players around a core that should be good enough to go far. 2 DatsyukianDekes and krsmith17 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
VM1138 1,921 Report post Posted May 4, 2015 I wouldn't mind Holland taking bigger risks of the contracts are short. I think the lifetime contracts he pioneered, that have now taken over the league, are what is making the league feel fairly stagnant to me. Limit contracts to three or four years and you'll see more turnover, less caution and more exciting parity. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Euro_Twins 4,485 Report post Posted May 4, 2015 I'd also like to point out the only time Pittsburgh made it past the second round since 09 when they won the cup was 4 years later in 12/13 and they immediately got swept in the conference finals by Boston. 1 DatsyukianDekes reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DatsyukianDekes 2,428 Report post Posted May 4, 2015 Boston fired their gm and there's a very good chance they will fire their coach too. Just making the playoffs isn't good enough for them. The penguins fired their gm and coach last year for underachieving and let's not forget they have won the cup more recently than us as well as making it past the second round more recently than us. The Kings just won a cup last year so their situation isn't really comparable. They are allowed a free pass. But I bet if they miss the post season again next year there will be another gm and head coach vacancy. The point is other franchises don't accept making the playoffs as good enough. We shouldn't either. Over half the teams make the playoffs. Just making it means you're little better than average. We're 6 years removed now from a deep post season run. Think about where you were 6 years ago and how much has changed since then. It's a long time. And it's an eternity in sports. Holland had made plenty of great moves yes. But he's also made plenty of bad ones also and he deserves a good amount of the blame for our post season failures since after all it's his job to run the team and everyone ultimately answered to him. Does that mean we fire him now? No. But the seat should start to be heating up at this point. You only get so many free passes. There is so much wrong in this post, I won't even bother. I will leave this though. Comparing a team that made the playoffs 24 years in a row, never picking above 15th in a quarter of a century to any other team in the Playoffs is beyond pathetic, they all would trade positions in a heartbeat. Wings took Tampa to 7 games this year, and should have really won the series. They would have beat Montreal as well. Wings really sucked last year, but we were missing Datsyuk, Zetterberg, and Ericsson plus it was the kids first playoffs. The year before that we took out Anaheim in 7 games, then we went on a took Chicago to 7 games OT. In case you didn't notice, we are still a team that every single team does not want to play in the playoffs when we have all our players. Lastly I will leave this. 24 - Red Wings (Best pick, 15th overall last year) 8 - Pittsburgh (4 top 5 picks in the last 8 years, including 2 1st overalls) Let that soak in for a while. 2 jimmyemeryhunter and krsmith17 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kliq 3,763 Report post Posted May 4, 2015 The penguins fired their gm and coach last year for underachieving and let's not forget they have won the cup more recently than us as well as making it past the second round more recently than us. I think this is a good example of how just firing your GM/coach don't necessarily make things better. 1 krsmith17 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
frankgrimes 1,836 Report post Posted May 5, 2015 (edited) Well the problem was that Shero has tied his future to Bylsma and since they've failed again both were fired although Shero hasn't done a bad job. Hate to admit it but after the Pens win the Stanley Cup I've thought they'd be on the verge of becoming a dynasty. Firing a coach and GM brings in different challenges that's why it usually isn't done until qualified Preston's persons are available either in-house or from the outside Also I would trade that ever so important streak for the chance to draft a guy like McDavid, Hall, Hanifin or Strome and not having to worry about the two most important positions for another decade...instead if clinching on to a streak and going out in the 1 first round and therefore not getting a top pick. Edited May 5, 2015 by frankgrimes Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kliq 3,763 Report post Posted May 5, 2015 Well the problem was that Shero has tied his future to Bylsma and since they've failed again both were fired although Shero hasn't done a bad job. Hate to admit it but after the Pens win the Stanley Cup I've thought they'd be on the verge of becoming a dynasty. Firing a coach and GM brings in different challenges that's why it usually isn't done until qualified Preston's persons are available either in-house or from the outside Also I would trade that ever so important streak for the chance to draft a guy like McDavid, Hall, Hanifin or Strome and not having to worry about the two most important positions for another decade...instead if clinching on to a streak and going out in the 1 first round and therefore not getting a top pick. So you think Holland should trade away all of our vets, and a ton our our young guys, just for a CHANCE to land one of those top picks? Look at last season, even with half our team hurt we still got in the playoffs. You cant guarantee yourself a top pick unless you just unload everyone. Plus, one player does not make or break a team. Look at Dallas with Seguin, or Edmonton with what seems to be all the top picks of the 2000's, you can have a top player and still suck. Tanking it is stupid because it guarantees nothing. 1 krsmith17 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
number9 3,297 Report post Posted May 5, 2015 So you think Holland should trade away all of our vets, and a ton our our young guys, just for a CHANCE to land one of those top picks? Look at last season, even with half our team hurt we still got in the playoffs. You cant guarantee yourself a top pick unless you just unload everyone. Plus, one player does not make or break a team. Look at Dallas with Seguin, or Edmonton with what seems to be all the top picks of the 2000's, you can have a top player and still suck. Tanking it is stupid because it guarantees nothing. Orr - McDavid - Mcgrattan McLaren - Eichel - Gadzic How would that not be the best two forward lines ever??? 2 GMRwings1983 and kliq reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
frankgrimes 1,836 Report post Posted May 5, 2015 Well the problem was that Shero has tied his future to Bylsma and since they've failed again both were fired although Shero hasn't done a bad job. Hate to admit it but after the Pens win the Stanley Cup I've thought they'd be on the verge of becoming a dynasty. Firing a coach and GM brings in different challenges that's why it usually isn't done until qualified Preston's persons are available either in-house or from the outside Also I would trade that ever so important streak for the chance to draft a guy like McDavid, Hall, Hanifin or Strome and not having to worry about the two most important positions for another decade...instead if clinching on to a streak and going out in the 1 first round and therefore not getting a top pick. So you think Holland should trade away all of our vets, and a ton our our young guys, just for a CHANCE to land one of those top picks? Look at last season, even with half our team hurt we still got in the playoffs. You cant guarantee yourself a top pick unless you just unload everyone. Plus, one player does not make or break a team. Look at Dallas with Seguin, or Edmonton with what seems to be all the top picks of the 2000's, you can have a top player and still suck. Tanking it is stupid because it guarantees nothing. That's not what I'm saying I've said I would trade the streak every time in order to get one of these players. McDavid is a game changer, Hanifin could become another Keith and well Strome a Backes light. Tanking alone in most cases won't help but being bad in a McEichel year isn't that bad at all we'll sadly find out soon with buffalo drafting Eichel and Toronto getting Hanifin which will give them a Rielly - Hanifin top pairing for at least 10 years Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
number9 3,297 Report post Posted May 5, 2015 That's not what I'm saying I've said I would trade the streak every time in order to get one of these players. McDavid is a game changer, Hanifin could become another Keith and well Strome a Backes light. Tanking alone in most cases won't help but being bad in a McEichel year isn't that bad at all we'll sadly find out soon with buffalo drafting Eichel and Toronto getting Hanifin which will give them a Rielly - Hanifin top pairing for at least 10 years Ah yes, lets watch and see how Edmonton, Toronto, and Buffalo do with those picks... I'm sure we'll all be positively surprised Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DatsyukianDekes 2,428 Report post Posted May 5, 2015 That's not what I'm saying I've said I would trade the streak every time in order to get one of these players. McDavid is a game changer, Hanifin could become another Keith and well Strome a Backes light. Tanking alone in most cases won't help but being bad in a McEichel year isn't that bad at all we'll sadly find out soon with buffalo drafting Eichel and Toronto getting Hanifin which will give them a Rielly - Hanifin top pairing for at least 10 years The Detroit Red Wings are going to ask their players to tank the year and break the playoff streak so they have a shot at a first overall pick..... wtf ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kliq 3,763 Report post Posted May 5, 2015 That's not what I'm saying I've said I would trade the streak every time in order to get one of these players. McDavid is a game changer, Hanifin could become another Keith and well Strome a Backes light. Tanking alone in most cases won't help but being bad in a McEichel year isn't that bad at all we'll sadly find out soon with buffalo drafting Eichel and Toronto getting Hanifin which will give them a Rielly - Hanifin top pairing for at least 10 years Then without unloading everyone, how do you achieve this goal? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
frankgrimes 1,836 Report post Posted May 5, 2015 That's not what I'm saying I've said I would trade the streak every time in order to get one of these players. McDavid is a game changer, Hanifin could become another Keith and well Strome a Backes light. Tanking alone in most cases won't help but being bad in a McEichel year isn't that bad at all we'll sadly find out soon with buffalo drafting Eichel and Toronto getting Hanifin which will give them a Rielly - Hanifin top pairing for at least 10 years Then without unloading everyone, how do you achieve this goal? Unloading a bunch of players that can be replaced by younger ones and keep a few veterans to guide those kids. But starting 2016 the top 3 picks will go into the lottery so the worst team could end up picking fourth. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
number9 3,297 Report post Posted May 5, 2015 Unloading a bunch of players that can be replaced by younger ones and keep a few veterans to guide those kids. But starting 2016 the top 3 picks will go into the lottery so the worst team could end up picking fourth. Who are they exactly? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
frankgrimes 1,836 Report post Posted May 5, 2015 Unloading a bunch of players that can be replaced by younger ones and keep a few veterans to guide those kids. But starting 2016 the top 3 picks will go into the lottery so the worst team could end up picking fourth. Who are they exactly? Everyone not named Z, Pasha (we wouldn't get a good price back and it would be classless to trade them), Kronner and Howard. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kliq 3,763 Report post Posted May 5, 2015 Everyone not named Z, Pasha (we wouldn't get a good price back and it would be classless to trade them), Kronner and Howard. In this hypothetical scenario, you are trading away Quincey, Cleary, Ericsson and Miller (maybe Helm/Abby?). First off, the return on these players is not going to be that high. Secondly, keeping our kids and our "big 3" we still have a chance of making the playoffs, or we are 9th or 10th seed which means likely nowhere near the top few picks. 1 krsmith17 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Son of a Wing 1,644 Report post Posted May 5, 2015 Everyone not named Z, Pasha (we wouldn't get a good price back and it would be classless to trade them), Kronner and Howard. Soo...trading everyone but Datsyuk and Zetterberg to purposely make us not competitive is not classless? That's a f***ed up sense of logic. I'd love to see that conversation with our leadership group. Just to get one shiny new toy. Selfish and disgraceful way of thinking. 3 Internet.Unknown, krsmith17 and Nightfall reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GMRwings1983 8,802 Report post Posted May 5, 2015 Orr - McDavid - Mcgrattan McLaren - Eichel - Gadzic How would that not be the best two forward lines ever??? Be honest. How much money would you pay to watch that team play? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites